Randomized trial investigates AI as a cultural agent in organizations, suggesting positive impacts on climate and employee satisfaction.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) means an intelligence without biological intervention without natural chemical and neuronal procedures, an evolutive process that search computer systems that can realize human tasks that want big efforts of human intelligence and many work hours, which in an arbitrary world will cope not worse than a human (Dobrev, 2012). In practical terms, an AI system comprises an agent and its environment. The agent perceives its surroundings through sensors and acts upon them using actuators. It moves through stages of perception, cognition, and action. By integrating AI, organizations can achieve several benefits: • Organizational Agility: AI-powered systems enable swift adaptation to changing circumstances. • Decision-Making Enhancement: AI assists decision-makers by providing data-driven insights. It augments human judgment, leading to more informed and precise choices. • Process Optimization: AI automates repetitive tasks, freeing up human resources for strategic endeavours. From recruitment to data management, AI streamlines operations. • Employee Experience: When AI acts as an ally rather than a competitor, it contributes positively to the organizational climate. Employees perceive AI as a tool that empowers them, leading to higher job satisfaction. • Ethical Considerations: Organizations must address ethical implications related to AI deployment. Ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability is crucial. We want to know, considering the above benefits, if AI is a cultural agent on organizational climate. For that we use a survey considering all aspects of this condition and a sample of 165 people that work with AI of several organizations, according with an aleatory choose through WhatsApp and LinkedIn contacts and using the Statistic package for Social Sciences (SPSS). In summary, according to the results, AI serves as a catalyst for the organizational growth, fostering a harmonious balance between technology and human agency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sílvio Manuel da Rocha Brito (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: