Key result
Dapagliflozin drives ~0.06 mm greater CIMT reduction versus metformin, with no difference in RHI.
Why the study?
The optimal first-line pharmacological therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus remains uncertain.
Does dapagliflozin monotherapy or combination therapy improve vascular and molecular outcomes compared to metformin in newly diagnosed T2DM?
RCT (n=60)
1:1:1
Does dapagliflozin monotherapy or combination therapy improve vascular and molecular outcomes compared to metformin in newly diagnosed T2DM?
In newly diagnosed T2DM, first-line dapagliflozin did not improve RHI compared to metformin but reduced CIMT and altered proteomic signatures suggesting cardioprotective mechanisms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combination dapagliflozin-metformin may improve vascular markers over monotherapy in new T2DM; extends glycaemic evidence to molecular endpoints in RCT.
AIMS: The optimal first-line pharmacological therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains uncertain. This trial compared the vascular and molecular effects of dapagliflozin monotherapy, metformin monotherapy, and their combination in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty participants were randomised 1:1:1 to metformin 500 mg twice daily (n = 19), dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily (n = 20), or dapagliflozin-metformin combination (n = 21) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) from baseline. Secondary endpoints were pulse wave velocity (PWV) and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), analysed by ANCOVA. Exploratory sphingolipid and proteomics profiling was performed using partial least squares discriminant analysis and ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: RHI did not differ significantly between groups (primary endpoint). Dapagliflozin produced significantly greater CIMT reduction versus metformin as a secondary endpoint (-0.058 mm; 95% CI -0.106 to -0.010; p = 0.018). PWV changes were non-significant between groups. Sphingolipid profiling identified dapagliflozin-specific downregulation of pro-inflammatory lactosylceramide species, particularly LacCer(d18:0) (AUC 0.814). Proteomics revealed upregulation of EpCAM and downregulation of endothelial adhesion molecules (JAM-A, PECAM-1, vWF) and tissue plasminogen activator with dapagliflozin compared with metformin. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naïve newly diagnosed T2DM, dapagliflozin produced significantly greater CIMT reduction versus metformin, accompanied by distinct sphingolipid and proteomic signatures suggesting pleiotropic cardioprotective mechanisms. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant validation in larger adequately powered trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05440591.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chee et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=60). Dapagliflozin vs. Metformin 500 mg twice daily or dapagliflozin-metformin combination was evaluated on Change in reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) from baseline. Dapagliflozin produced significantly greater CIMT reduction versus metformin (-0.058 mm; 95% CI -0.106 to -0.010; p=0.018), though change in reactive hyperaemia index did not differ between groups.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: