Develops a logical framework for higher-order ASP, demonstrating strong equivalence in higher-order programs, indicating new optimization strategies.
One of the most significant achievements of equilibrium logic was the characterization of strong equivalence, a property crucial for program transformation and optimization in answer set programming (ASP). While ASP has recently been extended to a higher-order setting to enhance its expressive power, the lack of a comparable purely logical foundation has made verifying strong equivalence for higher-order programs or even proving the correctness of simple program transformations, a difficult challenge. This paper addresses this gap by developing a logical semantics for higher-order ASP by extending the equilibrium logic framework. Within this extended framework, we demonstrate that every stratified higher-order logic program possesses a unique equilibrium model. Moreover, we establish definability results demonstrating that the syntax of our higher-order language is sufficiently expressive to capture its semantic domains. Finally, and most importantly, we generalize the classical theorem of strong equivalence to the higher-order setting: we prove that two programs are strongly equivalent if and only if they share the same higher-order models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charalambidis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: