Demonstrates accurate bee counting using hybrid edge-cloud object detection system, highlighting monitoring needs.
Stingless bee entrance monitoring requires a non-invasive tool to measure colony traffic without disrupting foraging. A hybrid edge-cloud object identification system and physics-aware vision instrumentation framework are used to track stingless bees in this paper. The system uses a Raspberry Pi 4 edge node, Sony IMX296 Global Shutter camera, Only Look Once (YOLO)-based detection, and Observation-Centric Simple Online and Realtime Tracking (OC-SORT) tracking. Because entry activity implies foraging intensity, the traffic count can be a non-invasive proxy for colony health and yield. The edge-side YOLO11 and OC-SORT tracking pipeline found trajectory fragmentation during high-speed ingress. A frame interval of 0.0667 s was achieved using a 15 FPS edge processing rate. Inter-frame displacement may approach 0.333 m for bee motion exceeding 5 ms-1, producing missed detections and identity switching. Thus, a sampling-based tracking failure situation happens when a bee travels more than the tracker's maximum association distance between two processed frames. This illustrates that frame rate, bee velocity, field-of-view scale, detector recall, tracker association tolerance, and biologically meaningful bee counting interpretation all affect bee tracking reliability. Validation using 14 one-minute Geniotrigona thoracica entrance videos showed an average IN counting accuracy of 85.0%, OUT counting accuracy of 66.7%, and total counting accuracy of 76.3% compared with manual video counting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yunus et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: