Systematic review synthesizes family interventions that improve health and weight outcomes in youth, suggesting effective family dynamics matter.
Family systems are a key influencing factor in the development and maintenance of overweight and obesity in childhood and adolescence with family-based interventions being considered the gold standard in paediatric weight management. So-called second-order level mechanisms, underlying family processes such as communication, parenting skills, and organisational abilities are of particular importance for sustaining family-level behavioural changes and improved health outcomes. This systematic review synthesises interventions that integrate such mechanisms and their impact on health- and weight related outcomes. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The initial search yielded 16,129 records, after a multistep process including two independent reviewers, n = 22 studies met the final inclusion criteria. Second-order level mechanisms addressed included parenting skills and practices (n = 11), parent-child relationships and communication (n = 6), family functioning and dynamics (n = 4), home and family environment (n = 3), and cultural and family values (n = 3), with several interventions addressing multiple mechanism clusters. n = 9 studies reported significant weight-related changes. Psychosocial and behavioral outcomes, when reported, showed improvements in health-related quality of life, family health routines, nutrition knowledge, and self-efficacy. This systematic review provides an integrative overview of family-based interventions utilising second-order level family mechanisms as structural and relational processes that may support the sustainability of change. The results offer a valuable framework for understanding how families regulate and maintain health behaviours beyond isolated behavioural components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: