Integrated Life Cycle Assessment and Cost Analysis of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices in Potato and Onion Cultivation

Although climate-smart agricultural practices are increasingly promoted, comparative environmental and economic assessments across multiple practices and crops remain limited. This study evaluates five climate-smart agricultural practices in Dutch potato and onion production, including soil management, biodiversity enhancement, sustainable irrigation systems, crop protection, and green energy use. It compares them with conventional production systems using integrated Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing. Specifically, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) methodologies were applied to assess the environmental and economic sustainability of the studied systems, respectively. Among the evaluated practices, soil management exhibited the best overall environmental performance for both crops, achieving reductions of up to 42% and 66% in greenhouse gas emissions for potatoes and onions, respectively, compared with the baseline under the modelled conditions. Biodiversity measures significantly reduced freshwater eutrophication and ecotoxicity-related impacts, particularly in potato cultivation, while crop protection practices mainly improved pesticide-related toxicity categories. Similarly, soil management and biodiversity demonstrated the best economic performance, with profits increasing to approximately €3318/ha and €3121/ha for potatoes and €3898/ha and €3694/ha for onions, respectively, compared with baseline profits of €2879/ha and €3526/ha. The results suggest that the implementation of CSA practices can improve both the environmental and economic sustainability of intensive vegetable production systems under the modelled Dutch conditions, although the effectiveness of each practice depends strongly on crop-specific environmental hotspots and management assumptions. The findings provide evidence to support farmers and policymakers in selecting cost-effective climate-smart practices while identifying priorities for future field validation and uncertainty assessment.