Descriptive phenomenological study shows how junior high English teachers lead instruction, facing challenges and employing strategies.
Instructional leadership has traditionally been associated with school administrators; however, emerging perspectives recognize teachers as active instructional leaders who influence teaching quality, student learning, and school improvement. This study explored the instructional leadership practices of Junior High School English teachers at Joji Ilagan International Schools, focusing on how teachers enact leadership, the challenges they encounter, and the strategies they employ to sustain instructional practices. Using a descriptive phenomenological research design, the study examined the lived experiences of five purposively selected Junior High School English teachers through semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase framework. The findings revealed that instructional leadership among English teachers is a multidimensional and evolving process embedded in everyday classroom practices. Five themes emerged: Holistic Leadership, Student Empowerment, Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Adaptive and Reflective Practice, and Distributed and Collaborative Leadership. The findings showed that teachers exercise instructional leadership by supporting students’ academic and personal development, promoting learner participation, adapting instruction to diverse needs, reflecting on teaching practices, and collaborating with colleagues and stakeholders. Despite challenges related to learner diversity, time constraints, classroom management, and limited resources, teachers demonstrated flexibility and innovation in sustaining effective instructional practices. The study contributes to the growing discourse on teacher-led instructional leadership by highlighting teachers’ voices within the Philippine private school context. It emphasizes that teachers are not merely curriculum implementers but active leaders who shape meaningful learning experiences and contribute to continuous school improvement. The findings suggest the importance of professional development programs, collaborative school structures, and institutional support in strengthening teachers’ capacity to lead instruction effectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andiam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: