Key result
CCTA effectively serves as a gatekeeper to invasive angiography by reliably excluding obstructive CAD.
CCTA has the potential to serve as an effective gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography by excluding obstructive CAD and evaluating lesion-specific ischemia.
Functional capacity is a robust predictor of clinical outcomes, and stress testing is used in current practice paradigms to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography. However, invasive coronary angiography is driven by ongoing symptoms, as well as risk of adverse outcomes. The limitations of current functional testing-based paradigms might be avoided by using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) for exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease. The growth of CCTA has been supported by comparative prognostic evidence with CCTA and functional testing, as well as radiation dose reduction. Use of CCTA for physiological evaluation of coronary lesion-specific ischemia may facilitate evaluation of moderate stenoses, designation of the culprit lesion, and prediction of benefit from revascularization. The potential of CCTA to serve as an effective gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography will depend, in part, on the adoption of these new developments, as well as definition of the benefit of detecting high-risk plaque for guiding the management of selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marwick et al. (2015) conducted a review in Obstructive coronary artery disease. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) vs. Functional testing was evaluated. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) may serve as an effective gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography by excluding obstructive coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: