Establishes a Reciprocity Selection Theorem for scalar fields, indicating implications for dark matter dynamics.
This paper establishes a *Reciprocity Selection Theorem* for conservative quadratic theories of N complex scalar fields propagating in a flat Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker (FLRW) background. Using a four-way decomposition of a general complex ordered coupling matrix—into symmetric-real, symmetric-imaginary, antisymmetric-real, and antisymmetric-imaginary parts—the theorem proves that real reciprocal couplings (Cᵢⱼ=Cⱼᵢ) eliminate the odd sine contribution to the polar interaction. Consequently, an apparent phase lag α can only dress the mass-squared coupling via κ≡ Kcosα and cannot generate a genuine Sakaguchi torque in a closed variational framework. The work derives four conservative coupling families: (I) the democratic Phase-Locked Klein–Gordon (PLKG) model as a rank-one exactly solvable realization; (II) general real symmetric weighted Kuramoto coupling; (III) complex symmetric coupling, which projects back to the real symmetric case; and (IV) Hermitian chiral coupling with an antisymmetric imaginary part as the minimal conservative route to displaced locking, subject to loop-closure constraints. For the democratic PLKG model, the full covariant amplitude–phase equations, stress–energy tensor, synchronization gap Msync²=κ, stability window, Fourier-space extension, and wavelet-based multiscale generalization are developed. The stiff-like equation-of-state regime wsync 1 is identified as a phase-kinetic limit requiring coherent dominance over amplitude and potential contributions. Numerical estimates for fuzzy/ultralight dark matter scales and cosmological synchronization efficiency are provided. The framework is formal and parametric; observational viability and perturbative constraints are identified as directions for future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Hadi Mahdavi Mortazavi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: