Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental trial evaluates impact resistance in fiber-reinforced concrete, suggesting optimal fiber mixtures.
Concrete structures subjected to impact loading exhibit considerable variability arising from material heterogeneity, non-uniform fiber dispersion, and stochastic crack development, making deterministic performance assessment alone insufficient. This study presents an integrated experimental and probabilistic framework for evaluating fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) incorporating six fiber types: steel, glass, polypropylene, polyvinyl alcohol, carbon, and basalt. Two concrete grades (M25 and M80) were investigated through compressive strength and repeated drop-weight impact tests. Nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to quantify the influence of fiber type and dosage, while a hierarchical Bayesian framework was employed to characterize uncertainty and reliability associated with compressive strength and impact resistance. The results revealed pronounced fiber and grade-dependent behavior, with the optimum steel fiber mixtures (SF-1.50 for M25 and SF-1.25 for M80) increasing impact resistance by approximately 141% and 166%, respectively, relative to the control mixtures. Steel fibers consistently exhibited the highest impact resistance and reliability, while basalt and carbon fibers emerged as the most effective non-metallic alternatives. ANOVA demonstrated that fiber type exerted a significantly greater influence on impact performance than dosage. Reliability assessment and probabilistic multi-objective optimization consistently identified SF-1.50 and SF-1.25 as the optimum mixtures for M25 and M80 concretes, respectively. The proposed framework provides a systematic basis for reliability-informed evaluation and selection of fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to repeated impact loading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hexil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: