Perspective discusses targeting metabolic vulnerabilities in breast cancer driven by epithelial-mesenchymal transition, highlighting new strategies.
Breast cancer (BC) continues to pose a substantial clinical challenge due to acquired resistance induced by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Nevertheless, this adaptive evolution, which frequently takes the form of a highly plastic, partial EMT (p-EMT) state, induces a profound lipidomic reconfiguration and iron dysregulation, thereby inadvertently revealing a targetable metabolic vulnerability: ferroptosis. In this Perspective, we outline the hierarchical molecular logic that governs this susceptibility, emphasizing the manner in which progressive p53 mutations (ranging from loss-of-function to gain-of-function) transform p-EMT cells from passive sensitization to an extreme “metabolic addiction.” We argue that conventional “occupancy-driven” kinase inhibitors are unable to eliminate these resistant populations because they are unable to dismantle the essential non-catalytic scaffolding functions of core EMT-induced kinases (EIKs). As a result, we suggest a paradigm shift toward a chemical biology approach that is “event-driven.” The p-EMT infrastructure can be irreversibly destroyed and resistant cells can be compelled to undergo catastrophic lipid peroxidation by deploying proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) against concealed scaffold super-hubs, particularly AXL and lemur tail kinase 3 (LMTK3), which are indispensable for stabilizing the hybrid p-EMT infrastructure. Additionally, we investigate the spatiotemporal modulation of this synthetic lethal axis by the tumor microenvironment (TME) through matrix mechanics and extracellular vesicles (EVs). Ultimately, we suggest a multimodal liquid biopsy strategy that couples specific oxidized phospholipid signatures with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) kinetics to precisely monitor in vivo ferroptotic events. This approach offers a transformative roadmap for eradicating minimal residual disease (MRD) and surmounting BC dormancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: