Retrospective cohort study evaluates LDH/HDL ratio's predictive value for mortality risk in sepsis patients, suggesting clinical relevance.
Background Sepsis remains a major cause of global mortality and is characterized by dysregulated inflammation, metabolic reprogramming, and organ dysfunction. Total lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) reflect complementary aspects of cellular injury and host inflammatory response. This study evaluated the prognostic value of the serum LDH/HDL ratio in patients with sepsis. Methods This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 1020 patients with sepsis. Baseline total LDH and HDL were measured within 24 h after admission or meeting sepsis criteria, and LDH/HDL was calculated from the first recorded values. Patients were grouped according to empirical LDH/HDL quartiles. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between LDH/HDL and 28-day all-cause mortality. Restricted cubic spline analysis, subgroup analyses, ROC analysis, calibration assessment, and decision curve analysis were performed to assess dose–response patterns and predictive utility. Results The 28-day mortality event count was 304 among 1020 patients. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significant survival differences across LDH/HDL quartiles (log-rank P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted Cox model, each 1-unit increase in Ln (LDH/HDL) was associated with higher 28-day mortality risk (HR = 1.629, 95% CI 1.418–1.872, P < 0.001). The association was approximately linear in spline analysis. The apparent AUCs were 0.693 for LDH/HDL, 0.715 for SOFA, and 0.758 for SOFA plus Ln (LDH/HDL). Conclusions Higher baseline LDH/HDL was independently associated with increased short-term mortality among patients with sepsis. LDH/HDL may provide additional prognostic information alongside established severity scores, but its incremental clinical value was modest and requires prospective external validation before clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: