Shows thrombosis risk increases with high Type II neutrophils in PNH patients, indicating therapy timing may need adjustment.
The clinical significance of PNH Type II white blood cells (WBCs) remains unclear. We assessed the relative percentage (rel%) of Type II neutrophils in 355 patients with a PNH clone ≥ 1% on neutrophils enrolled by 33 flow cytometry laboratories in the 5-year French nation-wide multicenter prospective observational study. We first analyzed 127 of 133 patients with a major PNH clone (≥ 50%) and evaluable Type II neutrophil rel%. Using hemolysis data available for 107 patients, a threshold of 3% Type II neutrophils rel% distinguished two groups: 22 "high Type II" and 105 "low Type II" patients. Hemolysis was less frequent in the "high Type II" group. Thrombosis was more frequent at diagnosis and during cumulative long-term follow-up in this group. High neutrophil rel% ≥ 3% was independently associated with thrombotic events. Among 222 patients with smaller PNH clones (1%-50%), 207 displayed evaluable Type II neutrophil rel%, of which 87 were classified as "high Type II" and 120 as "low Type II". Although no thrombosis was present at diagnosis, two thrombotic events occurred during follow-up in the "high Type II" group, whereas none were observed in the "low Type II" group. Long-term follow-up showed no major changes in Type II neutrophil rel%, irrespective of variations in total clone size. These findings suggest that, regardless of the total PNH clone size, PNH Type II neutrophil rel% is a stable parameter and may represent a reliable predictor of thrombosis, potentially supporting earlier consideration of anticomplement therapy initiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner‐Ballon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: