Quasi-experimental study shows improved satisfaction and cognitive function in surgical anesthesia patients, suggesting a beneficial nursing approach.
This study evaluated the effects of integrating evidence-based nursing (EBN) with proactive nursing on postoperative satisfaction and cognitive function in patients undergoing surgical anesthesia. This quasi-experimental study enrolled 160 adults scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Participants were allocated to an intervention group receiving a structured protocol combining EBN and proactive nursing, or a control group receiving standard postoperative care. The primary outcome was postoperative patient satisfaction, measured by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18). Secondary outcomes included pain scores (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE), postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, early mobility, and emotional well-being. The intervention group had higher PSQ-18 total scores before discharge than the control group (78.6 ± 6.9 vs. 69.4 ± 8.1; mean difference, 9.2; 95% CI, 6.8–11.6; Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.001). Repeated-measures analysis of VAS pain scores revealed significant time, group, and group × time interaction effects, indicating greater pain reduction over time in the intervention group. At 24 h postoperatively, VAS scores were 3.2 ± 2.1 in the intervention group and 5.6 ± 2.5 in the control group. The group × time interaction for MMSE scores was also significant: scores changed from 27.9 ± 1.4 preoperatively to 28.4 ± 1.2 at 72 h in the intervention group, and from 28.0 ± 1.5 to 27.3 ± 1.6 in the control group. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (11.3%) in the intervention group and 33 patients (41.3%) in the control group (adjusted p = 0.031). Integrating evidence-based and proactive nursing strategies was associated with improved postoperative satisfaction and selected recovery outcomes in surgical anesthesia patients. Given the quasi-experimental design, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in future randomized controlled trials. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: