Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This conceptual framework redefines life and consciousness using Yuanxian Theory, suggesting novel implications for biological complexity.
Modern biology, operating under the reductionist and mechanistic paradigms, has achieved monumental success in molecular biology and genomics. However, it has simultaneously drifted into a profound dilemma, remaining fundamentally unable to explain existential teleology, the origin of consciousness, and biological complexity. This paper argues that the root of this crisis lies not in a scarcity of empirical data or technical tools, but rather in a severe ontological displacement: modern biology reduces life to mere physicochemical phenomena within three-dimensional space—a framework defined here as the "Deficient Lifespan Paradigm." To resolve this impasse, this paper introduces Yuanxian Theory (YXT). Utilizing the first principle that the universe is a self-referential living entity, and governed by its four core laws—the Law of Cosmic Factor Conservation (FSC), the Law of True-Circle Self-Consistency (TCSC), the Law of Self-Referential Mind-Field Generation (SRM), and the Law of Spacetime Uniqueness (STM)—Yuanxian Theory redefines the very essence of life, establishing a rigorous ontological position for consciousness and qualia, which have long been exiled from scientific inquiry. Yuanxian Theory provides a novel, geometrically necessary explanation for the 64-digit limitation of the genetic code through a Six-Level Dimensional Reduction Mapping Spectrum, shifting the mystery from historical accident to topological invariance on a 64-dimensional compact torus (T64). It further reinterprets reproductive isolation as absolute high-dimensional topological distance and moves immunology from a defensive "war model" to a "Symbiotic Covenant," quantified by the newly introduced Symbiotic Equilibrium Index. Ultimately, this framework initiates a profound cognitive paradigm shift from empirical induction to a priori deduction, illuminating the path forward for the life sciences to transcend their current state of involution. The global logical completeness of this system has been formally verified without contradictions using the Lean 4 and Rocq dual interactive theorem provers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenyuan Acharya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: