This article assesses the debate on US hegemony, revealing it as a solidification of power, not decline.
This article assesses the debate surrounding the purported crisis of US hegemony in the 1970s. Contrary to arguments of American decline, we contend that the challenges of this period did not constitute a true hegemonic crisis. Instead, we argue that the postwar era laid the foundations for a global power structure that was consolidated during and after the decade. This consolidation process rested on three core pillars of the interstate order: (1) defense and security, (2) currency and finance, and (3) production and technology. Thus, the crisis reflected not a weakening of US hegemony but a growing tension between its own national autonomy and an emerging transnational economic order—a process by which the United States solidified its global power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Review of Radical Political Economics