Key result
High fall risk in older CR patients shows no association with functional capacity changes.
Why the study?
Fall risk is linked to restricted exercise and increased morbidity and mortality, but outcomes of patients with high fall risk in cardiac rehabilitation are not well documented.
Does high fall risk affect cardiac rehabilitation engagement and functional outcomes in older adults?
Observational (n=384)
Does high fall risk affect cardiac rehabilitation engagement and functional outcomes in older adults?
p-value: p=0.193
Older adults with high fall risk benefit similarly from cardiac rehabilitation as those with lower risk, achieving comparable improvements in functional capacity.
High fall risk identification in older CR patients warrants caution; leaves open effects on engagement and outcomes.
Purpose: Fall risk is associated with restricted exercise and increased morbidity and mortality. Outcomes of patients with high fall risk in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are not well documented. This study describes the prevalence of high fall risk in CR, associated patient characteristics, CR engagement, and outcomes. Methods: Electronic records were examined from CR patients aged ≥65 years. An 11-variable checklist identified high (≥2 risk factors) versus low fall risk. Groups were compared on demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables, CR sessions completed, and pre–post-CR functional capacity change per maximum effort exercise tolerance test (metabolic equivalent of task) or 6-Minute Walk Test distance. Results: The CR falls incident rate among 384 patients (70% male, mean age 74.2 ± 6.5) was 0.137/1000 visits. One quarter was identified as “high fall risk.” Ten percent reported fear of falling. The most common risk factors included visual difficulty (41%), balance disturbance (24%), and gait disturbance (23%). Patients with high fall risk were older (78.03 ± 6.78, P < .001), reported lower physical and mental health-related quality of life ( P ≤ .001), and attended slightly fewer CR sessions (23.80 ± 11.04 vs 26.47 ± 9.91; P = .18). There were no significant differences between groups in functional capacity (metabolic equivalent of task: P = .193; 6-Minute Walk Test: P = .141). Conclusions: Though patients with high fall risk share characteristics with known associations to lower CR referral (eg, older age and comorbidities), they are as likely to benefit from CR participation as patients with lower risk when supported by tailored exercise prescriptions and safety modifications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kibbey et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Cardiac rehabilitation (n=384). High fall risk (≥2 risk factors) vs. Low fall risk was evaluated on Pre–post-CR functional capacity change (metabolic equivalent of task) (p=0.193). High fall risk in older cardiac rehabilitation patients was not associated with significant differences in functional capacity change compared to low fall risk (MET P=0.193; 6MWT P=0.141).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: