Shows how collateral limitations influence bank profits in credit markets, suggesting policy implications.
We study a competitive credit market with adverse selection, capacity-constrained banks, and an exogenous cap on pledgeable collateral. Our main contribution is to show how, in a capacity-constrained Bester – Rothschild – Stiglitz environment, an exogenous cap on pledgeable collateral changes the structure of the separating equilibrium set. When a binding collateral cap rules out the standard zero-profit separating allocation, the model admits a continuum of separating equilibria in which risky borrowers choose zero-collateral contracts, safe borrowers choose contracts with the maximum allowed collateral, and interest rates vary within a bounded interval. Banks earn strictly positive expected profits in most equilibria – even in a one-period game. We also show that an interest-rate ceiling truncates the equilibrium set by capping the risky-type interest rate, highlighting a rationale for considering maximum rate policies when collateral limits bind. Finally, we discuss how bank entry affects outcomes: as the number of banks grows, profits on risky types vanish, but rents on safe types persist because collateral caps continue to preclude profitable screening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alegría-Castellanos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: