Randomized trial evaluates new approach to monitor dam safety through deformation analysis and segmentation.
Structural health monitoring of water dams is crucial to ensure their long-term safety and operational reliability. Traditional geodetic techniques, although precise, are limited to sparse observation points and cannot capture spatially heterogeneous deformations. Laser scanning enables comprehensive, area-wide acquisition, overcoming this limitation. Subsequent deformation analysis often relies on comparisons along the local surface normal, which are limited in detecting in-plane movements. To address this, this study presents an approach that combines image-based stone segmentation with point-cloud-based deformation analysis to estimate both in-plane and out-of-plane displacements across masonry dam surfaces. Individual stones are detected in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery using a deep learning segmentation model (Mask R-CNN) and subsequently projected into corresponding point clouds acquired by terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and UAV laser scanning. By establishing consistent stone correspondences across multi-epoch point clouds via centroid-based matching and local iterative closest point (ICP) alignment, the proposed method enables deformation analysis on a stone-by-stone level. Simulated deformations were applied to TLS- and UAV-based point clouds of a dam to evaluate the method. Results demonstrate that the approach achieves sub-centimeter accuracy for the TLS and low-centimeter accuracy for the UAV point cloud, as measured by the RMSE between the estimated and true deformation. Our approach outperforms conventional model-to-model comparison methods, such as Multiscale Model to Model Cloud Comparison (M3C2), for in-plane displacements. The integration of image segmentation and geometric analysis provides a powerful framework for full-field deformation monitoring of masonry structures, supporting the detection of instabilities and improving dam safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tobies et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: