This framework explores generative existence and emergence dynamics in complex systems, enhancing ontological understanding.
This paper develops Generative Continuum Ontology (GCO), an ontological framework that provides a unified perspective for understanding emergence, laws of nature, organized complexity, and the conditions of physical reality. The framework begins from the proposition that existence is ontologically fundamental and characterized by an intrinsic generative capacity (Φ). Rather than treating substances, objects, structures, processes, or relations as the fundamental constituents of reality, the present framework interprets them as organizational expressions and regime-dependent forms of organization arising within a generative continuum of existence. Φ denotes the intrinsic generative capacity of existence. Organizational expressions are understood as manifestations of this generative capacity. Organizational regimes are coherent and relatively stable organizational disclosures of such manifestations. Within and through these regimes, relations, objects, structures, laws, and forms of spatial and temporal organization become identifiable. Persistence and change are therefore interpreted as complementary expressions of ongoing generative activity rather than as opposing ontological categories. A minimal formal schema is introduced to clarify the relationships among existence, intrinsic generative capacity, organizational expressions, organizational regimes, emergence, stabilization, and law formation. The resulting ontological architecture offers an explanatory framework through which emergence across physical, biological, and complex systems may be interpreted with greater ontological coherence and explanatory economy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rony Moussa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: