TSUMS-ECO Chain v1. 0 establishes a public-layer governance replay standard for ecological integrity, carbon-ecology conflict, Indigenous governance review, evidence continuity, mitigation hierarchy, and institutional correction. TSUMS-ECO does not certify nature, biodiversity, carbon credits, offsets, or ecological outcomes. It records whether nature-related governance claims, ecological signals, carbon-ecology conflicts, Indigenous governance restrictions, evidence continuity, review delay, disclosure limits, and correction obligations became replayable, auditable, and review-ready governance facts. The public-layer architecture is defined as: GECO = (Iₑco, Qₑco, Rₑco, phiₑco, Aₑco, Mₑco) where Iₑco is the ecological input trace, Qₑco is the DataQuality layer, Rₑco / Reco is the pre-committed registry, phiₑco is the EcoState compiler interface, Aₑco is the role-mapping interface, and Mₑco is the correction loop interface. The document includes the ECO Innovation Matrix, Carbon-Ecology Firewall Matrix, Indigenous Governance Replay structure, A2L Evidence Continuity Relay, EcoState Ladder, DataQuality and Sensitive Data Protection Matrix, Mitigation Hierarchy Gate, Aeco role mapping, governance replay record schema, audit interface, governance correction loop, public communication layer, prohibited claims, and boundary limitations. This DOI edition intentionally excludes parameter weights, concrete thresholds, raw Traditional Ecological Knowledge, sensitive Indigenous coordinates, scoring functions, carbon-ecology calculation formulae, executable source code, and rules usable for direct sanction or certification. TSUMS-ECO does not replace competent authorities, courts, certification bodies, third-party validators, experts, carbon MRV methodology, Indigenous governance authority, community-recognized review mechanisms, or human judgment. Core archival sentence: TSUMS-ECO does not reduce living systems into carbon numbers, and it does not leave governance facts to post-event storytelling.
Ismahasan Vlian (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: