Key result
Pharmacist-led ED transition of care faces implementation barriers like limited awareness and system constraints.
Why the study?
Discharge from the emergency department to home exposes patients to medication-related risks, but successfully implementing pharmacist-led transition of care interventions depends on understanding key behavioural and contextual determinants.
Implementing a pharmacist-led transition of care program in the emergency department is feasible but requires early stakeholder engagement, adequate resourcing, and clear workflows to overcome contextual and behavioral barriers.
Warrants caution before scaling pharmacist-led ED transitions; qualitative data leave feasibility open for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Discharge from the emergency department (ED) to home often exposes patients to medication-related risks. Pharmacist-led interventions during this period may enhance medication safety and care continuity; however, successful implementation depends on understanding key behavioural and contextual determinants. AIM: To explore key stakeholders' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to implementing a pharmacist-led transition of care (ToC) programme for patients discharged home from the ED, and to identify strategies to enhance its integration into practice. METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with patients, clinical pharmacists, physicians, and nurses was conducted at a secondary care hospital. Participants were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analysed using an inductive-deductive approach informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Care Transitions Framework (CTF). RESULTS: Twenty-three participants contributed to the study. Key barriers to implementation included limited awareness and confidence in pharmacists' roles in the ToC process, care coordination and interprofessional collaboration challenges, and system-level (e.g. workload, infrastructure limitations) and patient-related (e.g. patient capability and motivation, competing demands) constraints. Facilitators included: recognition of existing gaps in ED-ToC and appreciation of pharmacists' expertise. Critical enablers identified were stakeholder engagement, supportive infrastructure (e.g. leadership, resources), and adopting flexible, person-centred implementation approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a pharmacist-led ToC programme in ED is feasible but contingent on early stakeholder engagement, adequate resourcing, and clear workflows. Addressing identified contextual and behavioural barriers and leveraging facilitators are essential for successful implementation in real-world ED settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hmoud et al. (2026) studied Discharge from the emergency department (n=23). Pharmacist-led transition of care programme was evaluated on Barriers and facilitators to implementing a pharmacist-led transition of care programme. A pharmacist-led transition of care program in the ED faces barriers like limited awareness and system constraints, based on a qualitative study of 23 stakeholders.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: