Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing complex PCI (4.2% vs. 7.7%; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.76).
RCT (n=2,342)
double-blind
randomly assigned
Hazard Ratio: 0.54 (95% CI 0.38–0.76)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 7.7%
BACKGROUND Whether a regimen of ticagrelor monotherapy attenuates bleeding complications without increasing ischemic risk in patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing complex PCI from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled TWILIGHT trial. METHODS In the TWILIGHT trial, after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, event-free patients remained on ticagrelor and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or placebo for 1 year. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 lesions treated, total stent length >60 mm, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, atherectomy device use, left main PCI, surgical bypass graft or chronic total occlusion as target lesions. Bleeding and ischemic endpoints were evaluated at 1 year after randomization. RESULTS Among 7,119 patients randomized in the main trial, complex PCI was performed in 2,342 patients. Compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor plus placebo resulted in significantly lower rates of BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding (4.2% vs. 7.7%; hazard ratio HR: 0.54; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.38-0.76). BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding was also significantly reduced (1.1% vs. 2.6%; HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21-0.80). There were no significant between-group differences in death, myocardial infarction or stroke (3.8% vs. 4.9%; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.52-1.15), nor in stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing complex PCI who initially completed 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, continuation of ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with lower incidence of bleeding without increasing the risk of ischemic events compared to continuing ticagrelor plus aspirin.
“This gives physicians a very, very good alternative to go to ticagrelor monotherapy [while] feeling confident that you're not raising the ischemic endpoints.”
Dangas et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=2,342). Ticagrelor plus placebo vs. Ticagrelor plus aspirin was evaluated on BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76). Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients undergoing complex PCI (4.2% vs. 7.7%; HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.38-0.76).