Key result
Rural residence is linked to ~2.4-fold higher odds of AMI self-referral versus urban living.
Why the study?
Self-referral during acute myocardial infarction can lead to treatment delays and potentially worsen outcomes, but the factors associated with this choice remained to be identified.
Does rural residency increase the likelihood of self-referral among patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=4,044)
Yes
Does rural residency increase the likelihood of self-referral among patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction?
Rural residency strongly predicts self-referral behavior during acute myocardial infarction, underscoring the need for public education on utilizing emergency medical services.
Rural AMI self-referral may support targeted EMS education; leaves open effects on timely PCI and outcomes.
Background/Objectives: the timely and effective management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is crucial to improve patient outcomes. ‘Self-Referral’ is defined as instances either where patients arrive at the hospital by their own means or are transported by someone else, rather than through professional emergency medical services. This approach can lead to treatment delays and potentially worsen outcomes. This study aims to identify the factors associated with the choice of self-referral among patients with AMI in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Methods: We used the data from the Regional Myocardial Infarction Registry of Saxony-Anhalt (RHESA), which included 4044 patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including 48.7% from urban areas (city of Halle) and 51.3% from rural areas (Altmark). The gender distribution was 65% male and 35% female, covering an age range from 25 to over 80 years. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with self-referral and its impact on reaching a hospital with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capability. Results: Rural residents were more likely to self-refer compared to those in urban settings (adjusted odds ratio 2.43 [95% CI: 2.00–2.94]). Odds of self-referral decreased with age, while metabolic factors, including hypertension, high body mass index (BMI), and diabetes, as well as sex were not associated with self-referral. Self-referral did not increase the odds of arriving in a hospital without PCI capability. (Adjusted odds ratio 1.12 [95% CI: 0.85–1.47]). Furthermore, in cases of self-referral, women did not have a disadvantage in reaching a hospital with PCI (0.91; 0.59–1.41) compared to men. However, in medically attended transports, women were at a disadvantage (odds ratio: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.06–1.67). Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for public education on self-referral and for medical personnel training to prevent gender bias in AMI transport to PCI-capable hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holland et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) (n=4,044). Rural residency vs. Urban residency was evaluated on Self-referral to a hospital for acute myocardial infarction (arriving by private means or third parties rather than professional emergency services) (adjusted OR 2.43, 95% CI 2.00-2.94). Rural residents were significantly more likely to self-refer to the hospital for acute myocardial infarction compared to those in urban settings (adjusted OR 2.43).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: