Key result
Physical activity and HIIT improve cardiac autonomic neuropathy vs control via distinct autonomic adaptations.
Why the study?
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of physical activity versus high-intensity interval training on the cardiac autonomic nervous system in young sedentary adults.
Does physical activity or high-intensity interval training improve cardiac autonomic neuropathy in young sedentary adults?
RCT (n=24)
Randomized into three groups
No
Does physical activity or high-intensity interval training improve cardiac autonomic neuropathy in young sedentary adults?
p-value: p=<0.001
Both moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and high-intensity interval training significantly improve cardiac autonomic function and functional capacity in young sedentary adults, though they have varying impacts on sympathetic versus parasympathetic dominance.
May indicate opposing autonomic shifts from HIIT versus moderate activity; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of physical activity versus high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the cardiac autonomic nervous system in young sedentary adults. Method. This randomized pilot study included sedentary adults aged 18 to 40 years, with less than 600 METs in IPAQ and moderate to severe stress on the Perceived Stress Scale. Twenty-eight participants were randomized into three groups: control, HIIT, and physical activity. The HIIT group underwent 30:30 sec circuit training, while the physical activity group engaged in moderate to vigorous aerobic activities for 12 weeks. The control group received education on the importance of exercise. The primary outcome was cardiac autonomic neuropathy assessed using Ewing’s battery of tests, and the secondary outcome was functional capacity. Result. Significant improvement in cardiac autonomic neuropathy was observed in both the physical activity (p < 0.001) and HIIT groups (p < 0.001), but not in the control group (p = 0.25). Physical activity showed a tendency toward parasympathetic dominance (p = 0.0002), while HIIT showed a tendency toward sympathetic dominance (p = 0.004). Significant improvements in functional capacity were noted in the physical activity (p = 0.002), HIIT (p = 0.001), and control (p = 0.021) groups. Conclusion. Both physical activity and HIIT significantly improve the autonomic nervous system and functional capacity. However, the type of training has varying impact on the autonomic nervous system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raman et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Sedentary lifestyle with moderate to severe stress (n=24). High-intensity interval training and physical activity vs. Control (education on importance of exercise) was evaluated on Cardiac autonomic neuropathy assessed using Ewing's battery of tests (p=<0.001). Both 12 weeks of physical activity and high-intensity interval training significantly improved cardiac autonomic neuropathy compared to control (p < 0.001), with physical activity favoring parasympathetic dominance and HIIT favoring sympathetic dominance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: