Key result
CIED magnet responses vary substantially by manufacturer, demanding tailored perioperative management strategies.
Why the study?
Perioperative management of CIED patients is increasingly challenging as devices grow more complex and responses to magnet application differ substantially by device type, manufacturer, and model.
Provides an overview of optimal perioperative management of CIED patients, highlighting that device response to magnet application varies substantially by manufacturer and model.
Requires device-specific verification before magnet use in CIED procedures; leaves open standardization of perioperative protocols.
With the demographic evolution of the population, patients undergoing surgery today are older and have an increasing number of sometimes complex comorbidities. Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are also getting more and more complex with very sophisticated programming algorithms. It may be generally assumed that magnet application reverts pacing to an asynchronous mode in pacemakers and disables tachycardia detection/therapy in internal cardioverter-defibrillators. However, depending on device type, manufacturer and model, the response to magnet application may differ substantially. For these reasons, perioperative management of CIED patients is getting more and more challenging. With this review article we provide an overview of optimal perioperative management of CIED patients with a detailed description of CIED response to magnet application depending on manufacturer and device-type, which may help in providing a safe perioperative management plan for the CIED patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özkartal et al. (2022) conducted a review in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) undergoing surgery. Magnet application and perioperative CIED management was evaluated. Perioperative management of cardiac implantable electronic devices requires tailored strategies because responses to magnet application differ substantially depending on device type and manufacturer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: