Examines vitamin D's role in periodontal health among well-controlled diabetes patients, indicating potential implications for treatment.
PurposeTo determine whether low serum vitamin D levels are inversely correlated with clinical parameters and positively correlated with gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) 25(OH)D₃, 1,25(OH)₂D₃, LL-37 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels in periodontitis patients with well-controlled type-2 diabetes (T2DM).Materials and MethodsTwenty-six well-controlled T2DM patients with periodontitis and Vitamin D insufficiency (Vit.D-IS group), and 15 well-controlled T2DM patients with periodontitis and Vitamin D sufficiency (Vit.D-S group) were included. Papilla bleeding index, bleeding on probing (BOP), supragingival plaque, clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing depth (PD) were evaluated. GCF total amounts of 25(OH)D, 1,25(OH)₂D₃, LL-37 and TNF-α were analyzed by ELISA. Serum 25(OH)D₃ levels were determined using liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry.ResultsWhole mouth CAL and BOP scores were higher in the Vit.D-IS group than those of Vit.D-S group (P=0.038, P=0.048, respectively). Whole mouth PD and plaque values were comparable in both groups. Differences were not detected in GCF 25(OH)D₃, 1,25(OH)₂D₃, LL- 37 and TNF-α levels between Vit.D-IS and Vit.D-S groups. Serum 25(OH)D₃ levels were adversely associated with CAL and BOP scores (P=0.018, P=0.049, respectively). Also, GCF 1,25(OH)₂D₃ total amounts were positively related with GCF LL-37 total amounts (P=0.0001).ConclusionSerum 25(OH)D₃ insufficiency was related to periodontal inflammation and destruction in periodontitis patients with well-controlled T2DM. However, GCF 25(OH)D₃, 1,25(OH)₂D₃, TNF-α and LL-37 total amounts were not correlated with serum vitamin D levels. We have opinion that obtaining and maintenance of periodontal health should be included in the diabetic treatment
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eren et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: