Analyzes gas composition effects on CH4 recovery in hydrate displacement, indicating significant operational insights.
The CH 4 /CO 2 displacement method is regarded as a highly promising approach for natural gas extraction, which can improve CH 4 recovery efficiency while achieving carbon sequestration. However, CO 2 purification is technologically complex and energy-intensive, and the replacement performance remains limited. Directly injecting CO 2 -rich industrial waste gases can not only improve the CH 4 recovery efficiency but also achieve waste gas sealing, reducing the cost of gas separation and purification. In this study, a model for replacing CH 4 hydrate with CO 2 -rich industrial waste gas is established based on the molecular dynamics method. The effects of temperature, pressure, concentration of industrial waste gas, and salinity on the molecular structure evolution and mass transfer behavior during the displacement process were comprehensively analyzed. The results indicate that an increase in temperature can significantly promote the release of CH 4 and the formation of CO 2 hydrates within the simulation range. The influence of pressure on the displacement process is relatively limited. Overall, the increase in pressure enhances the spatial correlation between CO 2 and the hydrate cage, promoting the displacement and sequestration of CO 2 . Compared with pure CO 2, the introduction of an appropriate amount of N 2 and NO can promote the displacement process, indicating that a small amount of associated components have a synergistic regulatory effect in confined systems. Salinity exerts a significant inhibitory effect on the displacement process by weakening the hydrogen bond network of H 2 O molecules and the intermolecular spatial correlation. This study offers a molecular-scale basis for mechanism analysis and operational condition evaluation of CO 2 participation in hydrate displacement within multicomponent industrial waste gas environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: