Investigates electrode surface roughness effects on electrolysis performance, indicating significant optimization potential.
This study investigates the influence of stainless-steel electrode surface roughness on the performance of alkaline water electrolysis under ultrasonic excitation. Four electrodes with distinct roughness levels were tested using a 30 wt.% KOH electrolyte and a probe-type ultrasonic processor operating at 26 kHz and 60 W. The experiments combined electrochemical characterization with high-speed imaging to evaluate hydrogen bubble dynamics and flow behavior through optical flow analysis. Results showed that ultrasound application promoted modest yet consistent improvements in current density (up to 4%) and voltage reduction, particularly at low voltages where buoyancy and surface tension forces compete. Among the tested surfaces, the electrode with intermediate roughness (S#01) exhibited the best overall performance, balancing active area and bubble detachment efficiency. In contrast, excessively smooth or rough surfaces demonstrated inferior behavior, suggesting the existence of a most favorable roughness within the tested range for maximizing ultrasonic benefits. Velocity field analyses revealed that ultrasonic vibration disrupted the directional flow, induced transient bubble clustering (“pseudo-coalescence”), and enhanced local mixing, effects that dissipated once the excitation ceased. The findings provide mechanistic insight into the coupled effects of surface topography and acoustic excitation on bubble dynamics, establishing a physical basis for the future design of optimized ultrasound-assisted electrolysis systems. The direct immersion of the sonotrode within the electrolyte, unlike most reported configurations, ensured efficient acoustic coupling and enabled the clear observation of these phenomena.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alves et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: