Post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (PD-TAAA) is a late sequela of chronic aortic dissection. Complex endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), including fenestrated and branched techniques (F/B-EVAR), enables aneurysm exclusion while preserving visceral perfusion; however, bridging stents are not specifically designed for PD-TAAA and are frequently used off-label. Evidence on bridging stent performance is largely derived from degenerative aneurysm cohorts, and PD-TAAA-specific data remain limited. This study evaluated outcomes of the VBX Stent Graft when used as a bridging stent during F/B-EVAR for PD-TAAA. This retrospective analysis included patients with PD-TAAA from the EMBRACE registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05143138), a multicenter, single-arm registry with retrospective and prospective components, with all outcomes core-laboratory-adjudicated. Procedural, early (thirty-day), and midterm outcomes at one and three years were assessed. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and freedom from target vessel instability, defined as loss of durable target vessel reconstruction. Twenty-one patients (mean age 61.5 years; range, 28–77 years) underwent F/B-EVAR with at least one VBX Stent Graft. In total, 82 visceral arteries were treated, of which 51 were bridged with a VBX Stent Graft. Technical success was 100%. Two serious adverse events occurred perioperatively, one requiring reintervention, with no thirty-day mortality or major adverse events. Freedom from all-cause mortality was 95.2% at one year and 90.5% at three years, with two deaths during follow-up. Freedom from target vessel instability at the patient level was 85.7% at both one and three years (95% CI, 62.0–95.2%). VBX Stent Grafts used as bridging stents during F/B-EVAR for PD-TAAA demonstrated high technical success, low early morbidity and mortality, and acceptable mid-term survival and target vessel stability, supporting their use in this challenging anatomical setting within the limitations of a small PD-TAAA cohort.
Jonsdottir et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: