Explores fracture mechanisms in 3D-printed Bouligand cementitious materials, suggesting new design strategies.
The inherent brittleness of cementitious materials presents a fundamental limitation for advanced structural applications. While bio-inspired Bouligand architectures have demonstrated remarkable damage tolerance in natural composites, their systematic translation to brittle inorganic binders via 3D concrete printing (3DCP)—and the development of high-fidelity meso-scale models to quantitatively map the resulting strength–toughness design space—remains underexplored. This study aims to decouple the intrinsic topological toughening potential of helicoidal Bouligand architectures from the stochastic defects inherent to additive manufacturing, through a meso-scale finite element (FE) framework. To physically validate the model, a nano-clay-assisted rheological strategy was utilized to enable the support-free fabrication of these helicoidal prototypes. Computationally, a meso-scale FE framework integrating the concrete damaged plasticity (CDP) model with three-dimensional cohesive zone elements was developed to explicitly resolve inter- and intra-layer interfacial crack kinematics. Coupled physical compression tests and numerical simulations indicate that the 15° Bouligand architecture achieves a computationally predicted 16.3-fold increase in volumetric energy absorption (experimentally: 13.7-fold) compared to the 0° unidirectional baseline, with a modest ~11% reduction in compressive strength (from ~33.0 MPa to ~29.5 MPa in simulations; ~12% experimentally). Furthermore, numerical parametric studies across the complete pitch-angle design space reveal an optimal topological window at 15–30°, wherein the competing effects of crack deflection and structural integrity are balanced. Imperfection sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the topological toughening mechanism is relatively robust: even with a 30% reduction in inter-filament bonding strength, the work of fracture remains 12.4 times higher than that of the 0° control. These findings suggest that spatial toolpath programming offers a viable, geometry-driven strategy for developing damage-tolerant cementitious composites, complementing conventional material-level reinforcement approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: