Randomized trial evaluates accuracy of global land cover products for forest mapping in Poland, suggesting improved methods.
Using accurate land cover data is essential to monitor land use and cover changes and assess the effectiveness of various environmental policies. This study evaluates the accuracy of contemporary global land cover products with 10 m spatial resolution, including Google’s Dynamic World (GDW), European Space Agency’s World Cover (ESA WC) and Esri Land Cover (ELC) in mapping forested areas in Poland, aiming to test an assumption if the combination of these products may improve forest mapping accuracy compared to any individual product. Three global datasets and their combinations were assessed with the 2022 EU Land Use/Cover Area Frame Survey (LUCAS). A land cover map of Poland (S2GLC PL) for 2021 served as an auxiliary reference data set. Forest cover classification accuracy was evaluated using precision, recall, and F1-score metrics, and spatial agreement of binary forest maps in the thematic global products was measured with the Intersection over Union (IoU) at two various scale levels (country and province). Our results showed that forest mapping accuracy of three global products varies for Poland, with F1-score equal to 72.2% for ELC, 76.9% for ESA WC, and 68.8% for GDW. IoU against S2GLC PL was equal to 82.6%, 82.3% and 75.2%, for ELC, ESA WC and GDW, respectively, and slightly exceeded 70.5% for three global products. A specific combination of binary forest maps from global products, where the output forest area consisted of forests mapped at the same time by all three products and forests mapped at the same time only by GDW and ESA WC yielded better accuracy indicators than any single product and other tested combinations (F1-score equal to 80.4%, and IoU against S2GLC PL equal to 87.1%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahbandeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: