Survey reveals barriers to robotic surgery in plastic surgery, highlighting the need for increased training and access.
Background: While the launch of the da Vinci Surgical System catalyzed the expansion of robotic surgery across disciplines, adoption in plastic surgery remains modest. To explore this disconnect, this study surveys plastic surgeons to gauge interest, utilization, and perceived barriers to robotic surgery adoption. Methods: A 15-question survey on training, access, interest and barriers to robotic procedures was developed on Qualtrics and distributed via email to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) in May 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Results: 123 responses were collected among 3,512 survey recipients. Among respondents, 84.6% reported having to a surgical robot, however only 13.8% had training on robotic systems during residency, and only 12.2% utilized the technology for plastic surgery procedures. Interest in robotics was noted among 47.9% of respondents, particularly for DIEP flap procedures (65.5%), rectus/VRAM flaps (58.2%), and hernia repairs (27.3%). Key barriers to adoption included training requirements (63.9%), lack of demand (60.2%), increased operative time (54.6%), and financial concerns (26.9%). Additional obstacles cited were credentialing difficulties, and skepticism about the necessity of robotics in plastic surgery. Conclusions: The present survey identified inadequate training, high costs, and limited demand as key barriers to the adoption of robotics in plastic surgery, reflecting the current lack of robotic integration into residency curricula, as well as the substantial investment and maintenance costs associated with robotic systems. Nevertheless, the strong interest in robotics highlights the need for expanded training programs, promotion of clinical benefits and research quantifying potential downstream savings to overcome these barriers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: