Study evaluated rheological properties of collagen-polysaccharide gels, suggesting sustainable applications.
Octopus maya is a fast-growing species from the Yucatán Peninsula with high economic relevance, accounting for a major share of regional fishery production. However, a significant fraction of the organism, rich in type I collagen, is discarded as by-products, representing a promising and underutilized source for sustainable biomaterials. This study evaluated, through a 32 factorial design, the effect of two factors on the rheological and dynamic mechanical properties of film-forming solutions (FFS). The first factor was the type of food-grade polysaccharide: chitosan (Ch), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), or starch (S). The second factor was the proportion of each polysaccharide blended with ultrasound-extracted Octopus maya insoluble collagen (CIPM), using polysaccharide ratios of 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30 (w/w). This approach aims to valorize octopus by-products through the recovery and functional utilization of collagen. Rheological properties were determined by rotational and oscillatory rheometry at 25 °C, with flow curves fitted to the Carreau-Yasuda model. All formulations exhibited pseudoplastic behavior (n < 1), with viscosity decreasing as shear rate increased. Pure CIPM showed high viscosity (190.36 Pa·s at 1 s−1), which decreased (0.3–10.44 Pa·s) in HPMC and chitosan systems, suggesting their potential suitability for applications requiring fluidity, such as spray coatings or film-forming solutions, based on their rheological properties. In contrast, starch-based systems exhibited higher viscosities (33.54–197.53 Pa·s) and a more structured viscoelastic profile (G′ > G″), suggesting potential suitability for thick coatings or gels requiring structural stability, although these applications were not experimentally validated. These results demonstrate that CIPM-polysaccharide systems enable tunable rheological properties, supporting the use of Octopus maya collagen as a sustainable functional material for advanced food and biomaterial design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acosta-Pacheco et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: