Randomized trial demonstrates carbon emissions' spillover effects in urban areas, suggesting integrated climate approaches.
The urban heat island (UHI) effect represents a critical urban climate phenomenon arising from the combined pressures of rapid urbanization and climate warming. Although its association with carbon emissions has received increasing scholarly attention, the underlying behavior-mediated pathways and cross-regional spillover patterns remain insufficiently understood. Using multi-source geospatial data for the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from 2014 to 2023, this study develops a multi-scale analytical framework integrating 1 km urban agglomeration exploratory analysis and 5 km spatial econometric modeling. Anthropogenic Energy Activity Intensity (AEAI) is constructed as a proxy for energy-related human activities, and a spatial Durbin model, combined with a spatial mediation approach, is employed to examine the spatial associations and statistically mediated pathways within the “heat-energy-carbon” nexus. The results indicate that: (1) carbon emissions exhibit significant positive spatial spillover effects, consistent with thermal diffusion processes and socioeconomic network interactions; (2) AEAI represents a substantial partial statistical mediation pathway in the association between UHI and carbon emissions, accounting for 44.63% of the total association. This suggests that the UHI–carbon emission linkage is partly embedded in spatial patterns of energy-intensive human activities rather than reflecting a purely direct thermal effect. These findings suggest that regional climate governance may need to move beyond single-city interventions and purely physical cooling strategies toward integrated approaches that combine cross-regional coordination with behavioral regulation. Promoting passive cooling-oriented urban planning and demand-side energy transitions may help reduce carbon lock-in risks and support the development of climate-resilient urban agglomerations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: