Randomized trial examines plant diversity in wetlands, indicating the impact of invasions and environmental factors.
Biological invasions and environmental gradients are major drivers of biodiversity change in wetland ecosystems, but their associations on native plant diversity in Central Asian riverine wetlands remain poorly understood. We surveyed 158 wetland plant communities across 54 transects in the Ertix River Basin to examine how environmental gradients (elevation, mean annual temperature [MAT], and mean annual precipitation [MAP]) and non-native plant establishment jointly related to native plant importance values and alpha diversity indices. Non-native plants were classified according to invasion stage—non-naturalized, naturalized, and invasive—to elucidate how the associations between alien plants and native communities shift dynamically along the invasion continuum. Elevation emerged as the dominant predictor, explaining 82% (individual R2 = 0.15) of the variance in native species richness and 63.37% (individual R2 = 0.1) of the variance in the Shannon–Wiener diversity index, while MAT and MAP were not retained as significant predictors in the optimal models. Native plant importance values, richness, and diversity all increased with elevation. Unexpectedly, naturalized plant richness and abundance were positively associated with native diversity metrics, contrasting with the negative associations of all non-native categories (non-naturalized, naturalized, and invasive) on native importance values, partly reflecting the compositional nature of this metric. Our results reveal positive co-occurrence patterns between early-stage naturalized species and native species, but native dominance may eventually decline as invasion intensity increases. These findings highlight the importance of considering invasion stage when predicting wetland biodiversity responses to biological invasions under environmental heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: