Screening candidates for biopolymer membranes enhances carbonic anhydrase immobilization in direct air capture, indicating improved enzyme use.
Direct air capture (DAC) requires carbon capture interfaces that operate under highly dilute CO2 conditions while minimizing thermal and chemical regeneration penalties. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) accelerates the reversible hydration of CO2 to bicarbonate and is therefore a strong biocatalytic candidate for low-temperature CO2 capture, but its implementation depends on candidate support materials that combine wet-state accessibility, chemical reactivity, mechanical processability and compatibility with membrane architectures. This study reports the preparation and screening of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS)-reactive biopolymer composite membranes for future carbonic anhydrase (CA) immobilization. Chitosan particles were precipitated with citrate or tripolyphosphate under high-shear homogenization and compared after lyophilization or convective drying. Chitosan-, shellac-, agarose- and cellulose-acetate-based films plasticized with glycerol and/or polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG-400) were then evaluated by optical microscopy, dry-state penetrometric puncture testing, qualitative EDC/NHS-reactivity mapping and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Freshly precipitated chitosan particles showed dendrite-like high-surface morphologies, while lyophilization preserved porous flocculated aggregates and convective drying produced denser collapsed structures. Neat chitosan showed the highest dry-state puncture force (2.230 ± 0.173 N), whereas chitosan/shellac (0.377 ± 0.044 N) and agarose/chitosan/PEG-400 (0.386 ± 0.038 N) provided the strongest reactive-composite compromise between dry-state puncture resistance and EDC/NHS compatibility. The EDC/NHS reactivity map identified chitosan- and shellac-containing films as the chemically most relevant supports because they provide amine and/or carboxyl functionality, whereas agarose and cellulose acetate alone were not directly suitable for zero-length amidation. FTIR spectra confirmed polymer-specific functional signatures and EDC/NHS-associated changes in carbonyl, amide and C-O/C-O-C regions, especially in shellac- and chitosan-containing composites. The results identify chitosan/shellac as the lead candidate membrane and agarose/chitosan/PEG-400 as a hydration-rich comparator for subsequent carbonic anhydrase immobilization studies. This work should be interpreted as a first-stage materials-screening study of candidate membranes for enzyme immobilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerimov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: