Shows effective removal of Cr(VI) and CR in wastewater, suggesting a viable treatment method.
Wastewater containing heavy metals and dyes poses serious environmental risks. This study developed a multifunctional composite by coating polyurethane foam (PUF) with milled activated carbon (mAC) and a zirconium-based metal–organic framework (Zr-MOF) for the simultaneous removal of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and Congo red (CR). The composite was synthesized using a hydrothermal method to grow Zr-MOF on the surface. The SEM analysis confirmed the successful incorporation of mAC and surface modification with Zr-MOF, which resulted in increased surface roughness and porous morphology. XRD and FTIR confirmed the presence of organic ligands connected to the metal structure and the functional groups of each component in composite materials. The optimum conditions for Zr-MOF/mAC/PUF adsorption (nearly 100% removal) in the binary Cr(VI)/CR solution (50 mg/L each) were 25 °C, pH 9, and 150 rpm for 24 h. The Zr-MOF/mAC/PUF was hydrophilic with a swelling ratio of 2.64 g/g. The thermodynamic investigation of Zr-MOF/mAC/PUF resulted in 141.6218 kJ/mol for Cr(VI) and 166.111 kJ/mol for CR of ΔH° (rapid adsorption), negative ΔG° (spontaneous adsorption), a high positive value of ΔS° (disorder structure) and low activation energy (approximately 2.5 to 2.8 kJ/mol). After analyzing the isotherm and reaction kinetics, the possible mechanism could be endothermic physicochemical adsorption and pseudo-second-order kinetic behavior, with electrostatic attraction and diffusion control. The study of 6-times-reused Zr-MOF/mAC/PUF adsorption identified as a decrease of 7.55 percentage point without changing notable morphology and functional groups, based on SEM and FTIR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alapol et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: