This special issue uncovers the transformation of industrial policy in non-hegemonic powers, suggesting new insights on global dynamics.
This special issue unpacks the transformation of industrial policy among non-hegemonic powers (NHPs) by bridging otherwise compartmentalized debates within comparative political economy and international political economy. Four cross-cutting findings emerge across the contributions. First, industrial policy is conditioned by the historical legacies of each country’s positioning in the global economy. Second, exposure to unstable geoeconomic competition exerts a decisive influence on industrial policy. Third, domestic institutions and political dynamics mediate the effects of external pressures. Fourth, while industrial policy may improve competitiveness in exceptional cases, it often comes at the expense of new inequalities for NHPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Apaydin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: