Meta-analysis assesses secondary metabolites' effects on methane production and cattle performance, suggesting a promising nutritional strategy.
Rumen methane emissions contribute to global warming and energy loss in cattle. The use of plants rich in secondary metabolites to mitigate methane emissions has been extensively studied, with varying outcomes. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the impact of secondary metabolites on methane production, productive performance, and ruminal fermentation in beef cattle supplemented with plant-based additives. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, 43 of the 578 studies were selected for analysis, employing random-effects models to estimate the raw and standardized mean differences (RStudio: metafor and ggplot, with significance thresholds of p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.1). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic, alongside a subgroup meta-regression examining variables such as dose, additive type, additive form, and forage-to-concentrate ratio. After performing Egger’s test and trim and fill analysis, it was determined that tannins reduced methane yield (g/kg DM, adjusted SDM = −0.463), increased propionate production (%, RMD = 0.066, p = 0.001), rumen pH (adjusted SMD = 0.307), and organic matter intake (RMD = 0.066, p = 0.01). Despite phenolic compounds, flavonoids, terpenes, and terpenoids successfully modulating methane production, fermentative parameters, and nutrient intake, the limited number of comparisons and publication bias suggest caution in generalizing these results. In conclusion, supplementation with plant-based additives containing tannins offers a promising nutritional strategy for reducing enteric methane emissions while maintaining beef cattle performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Villalobos-Arias et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: