Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis demonstrates a quasi-realist approach to understanding quantum mechanics and moral claims, implying valuable insights into physical systems.
Attempting to understand quantum claims as describing physical systems leads to well-known difficulties. In this regard, quantum mechanics is like ethics : attempting to understand moral claims as describing physical systems leads to (different) well-known difficulties. I argue that the quasi-realist strategy for addressing the latter issue can also help with the former. Quasi-realism starts from a non-representationalist understanding of a particular type of claim, and proceeds to argue that we can nevertheless recover the roles of those claims in discourse that are typical of realism. I defend a quasi-realist interpretation of quantum mechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Lewis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: