Randomized trial simulates carbon storage changes in ecosystems, suggesting targeted climate adaptation measures.
Carbon storage dynamics in dryland and semi-arid ecosystems remain a major uncertainty in global carbon cycle assessments, particularly in regions like the Yellow River Basin (YRB). Using the Arid Ecosystem Model (AEM), we simulated the spatiotemporal evolution of four major carbon pools—total carbon (TOTC), vegetation carbon (VEGC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and litter carbon (LTRC)—from 1981 to 2060 under factorial climate scenarios. During 1981–2020, TOTC increased by 0.09 Pg C (+3.54%), driven by gains in VEGC (+0.03 Pg C, +21.43%) and SOC (+0.06 Pg C, +2.78%). LTRC showed minimal net change but was highly sensitive to interannual variability. From 2021 to 2060, under the high-emission SSP5 scenario, TOTC is projected to increase by 0.114 Pg C (+4.81%), with VEGC contributing most of the gain (+23.87%). CO2_only simulations showed similar increases, underscoring the dominant role of CO2 fertilization. In contrast, warming and precipitation alone produced weaker and more variable effects. Spatially, upper YRB regions are expected to maintain strong sink capacity, while the Loess Plateau and central-western subregions remain vulnerable to warming and moisture decline. LTRC exhibited the highest variability across scenarios (−18% to +22%), highlighting its role as a sensitive indicator of sink stability. These findings emphasize the need to account for nonlinear climate–carbon interactions and regional heterogeneity. Region-specific, adaptive strategies that integrate ecological restoration and climate adaptation will be critical to enhancing carbon sinks and supporting China’s carbon neutrality targets in the Yellow River Basin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: