Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical review analyzes chitosan nanoparticles for agriculture, highlighting production methods and applications.
Nanoparticles of the aminopolysaccharide chitosan (ChNPs) are effective delivery platforms for biologically active substances for agrobiotechnological applications and hold great promise for solving precision problems in sustainable and efficient agriculture. This review presents an analysis of research publications during the past 20 years examining methods for producing ChNPs through ionotropic gelation using sodium tripolyphosphate for cross-linking macrochains, which are of practical interest for agriculture. Key aspects of the nanostructure formation process are analyzed, including the influence of the physicochemical characteristics of the aminopolysaccharide, the concentration and ratio of reagents, and ionic cross-linking conditions on the average size, size distribution (polydispersity), and zeta potential of nanoparticles. Particular attention is paid to several approaches proposed in the literature for determining optimal gelation conditions to obtain ChNPs with pre-specified size characteristics. Potential applications of nanostructured preparations based on these nanoparticles for agrobiochemical purposes are considered, including the encapsulation of antifungal, antiviral and antimicrobial agents, pesticides, NPK fertilizers, metal ions, plant extracts, essential oils, etc., to develop biodegradable stimulants for seed germination and plant growth, increased crop yields, and improved agricultural product quality. It is concluded that blocking the protonated amino groups of chitosan with tripolyphosphate anions is undesirable due to the reduced biological activity of the macromolecules and the nanostructured preparations obtained therefrom. An alternative approach for producing ChNPs with high biological activity with neither use of cross-linking agents nor encapsulation of agrochemicals is described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shmakov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: