Observational substudy finds high effectiveness of CAB+RPV in people with HIV with NNRTI RAMs, suggesting viability.
Background The impact of pre-existing non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) on the effectiveness of long-acting (LA) cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) remains poorly defined, particularly for mutations like K103N that do not directly compromise RPV susceptibility (non-RPV NNRTI RAMs). Methods This observational substudy within the Spanish RELATIVITY cohort included people with HIV (PWH) who switched to CAB+RPV LA before 2025. We compared virologic outcomes between those with non-RPV NNRTI RAMs and a reference group without NNRTI/INSTI RAMs or prior NNRTI-based virologic failure (VF). An additional subgroup with RPV-associated RAMs was also analyzed. Confirmed virologic failure (CVF) was defined as two consecutive viral loads ≥ 200 copies/mL or one ≥500 copies/mL. Results Among 1,358 participants, 83 (6.1%) harbored non-RPV NNRTI RAMs (47 with K103N) and 1,247 served as the reference group. After a median follow-up of 16.7 months, CVF rates were similar between the non-RPV NNRTI RAMs group and the reference group (1.2% vs. 0.8%; HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.18–10.84; p = .755). No significant differences were observed in viral blips (6% vs. 8.2%; p = .481). Notably, in the subgroup of 28 participants with RPV-associated RAMs (including 5 with high-level resistance), no CVFs occurred over a median of 13.5 months. Conclusions In a real-world setting, CAB+RPV LA demonstrated high effectiveness in PWH with pre-existing NNRTI RAMs that do not compromise RPV susceptibility, including K103N. While no failures were seen in those with RPV-associated RAMs, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rial‐Crestelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: