Retrospective study analyzes mandibular fracture patterns in a single center, indicating seasonal and demographic influences.
Objectives To analyse epidemiology, fracture patterns, injury mechanisms, and management of mandibular fractures over 5 years at a single department. Materials and Methods Medical records of patients treated for mandibular fractures at a single tertiary department (Jan 2020–Aug 2025) were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, cause of injury, fracture site, multiplicity, seasonal distribution, and treatment modality were recorded. Statistical analysis included Chi-square, Z-test, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis test. P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among 660 patients (478 males, 182 females), 970 fracture lines were identified; 50% had multiple fractures. Condylar fractures were most common ( n = 334), followed by angle ( n = 207), body ( n = 206), and symphysis ( n = 158). Interpersonal violence predominated in men, falls were more frequent in women ( p < 0.0001). Surgical treatment was performed in 456 patients (69%), 204 (31%) received conservative management, mainly those over 60 years ( p < 0.0001) and isolated condylar fractures. Significant summer peak was observed compared to winter ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions Mandibular fractures show sex-specific injury patterns, with interpersonal violence in men and falls in women. Treatment decisions are guided by fracture complexity and patient age, and incidence is higher during summer months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vavro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: