Develops quality indicators for older adults in publicly funded services, suggesting improvements in service quality monitoring.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Consumer-reported measures are important quality indicators for assuring person-centeredness in home and community-based services (HCBS). However, administrative data commonly used to assess HCBS quality often lacks consumer-reported measures. The National Core Indicators-Aging and Disability (NCI-AD) Adult Consumer Survey (ACS) presents an opportunity to address this gap. We analyzed data from the NCI-AD ACS to develop and validate novel consumer-reported quality indicators for older adult consumers of publicly funded HCBS. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We applied exploratory factor analyses to data from the 2018-2019 survey wave (n = 5,572 community-dwelling older consumers, age ≥65 years) and identified seven QIs. We confirmed the validity of these seven new QIs in two ways: (1) qualitatively through a technical expert panel (for face validity and contextualization) and (2) quantitatively, using confirmatory factor analyses in the 2017-2018 survey wave (n = 9,145 community-dwelling consumers, age ≥65 years). RESULTS: The seven newly developed and validated QIs included service satisfaction (3 survey items, Cronbach's alpha = 0.89, McDonald's omega = 0.90), staff quality (5 survey items, alpha = 0.86, omega = 0.89), environmental safety (4 survey items, alpha = 0.81, omega = 0.89), service decision-making (5 survey items, alpha = 0.79, omega = 0.86), daily life decision-making (5 survey items, alpha = 0.73, omega = 0.81), community inclusion (5 survey items, alpha = 0.78, omega = 0.86), and overall health and quality of life (4 survey items, alpha = 0.63, omega = 0.70). In exploratory descriptive analyses, for some domains we found differences in scores by dementia status and age. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These seven new consumer-reported quality indicators can be used by researchers, service providers, and policy makers for evaluating and monitoring service quality and identifying modifiable targets for quality improvement in publicly funded HCBS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shippee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: