Key result
Systematic review identifies 38 feasible quality indicators for older patient care transitions.
Why the study?
What are the feasible quality indicators for care transitions in older persons?
Systematic Review
What are the feasible quality indicators for care transitions in older persons?
This study identified 38 feasible quality indicators for care transitions in older adults, highlighting gaps in standardized QI development and limitations of free-text documentation.
QIs enable standardized monitoring of older adult care transitions in Canada; extends prior work by validating administrative data feasibility.
We identified quality indicators (QIs) for care during transitions of older persons (≥ 65 years of age). Through systematic literature review, we catalogued QIs related to older persons' transitions in care among continuing care settings and between continuing care and acute care settings and back. Through two Delphi survey rounds, experts ranked relevance, feasibility, and scientific soundness of QIs. A steering committee reviewed QIs for their feasible capture in Canadian administrative databases. Our search yielded 326 QIs from 53 sources. A final set of 38 feasible indicators to measure in current practice was included. The highest proportions of indicators were for the emergency department (47%) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domain of effectiveness (39.5%). Most feasible indicators were outcome indicators. Our work highlights a lack of standardized transition QI development in practice, and the limitations of current free-text documentation systems in capturing relevant and consistent data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted a systematic review in Transitions in care. Quality indicators for care transitions was evaluated on Feasible quality indicators for care transitions. A systematic review and Delphi process identified 38 feasible quality indicators for older persons' care transitions, with 47% related to the emergency department.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: