Demonstrates improved cloud removal in optical remote sensing images using SAR guidance, indicating significant efficiency gains.
Cloud contamination obscures ground objects, interferes with surface reflectance, and disrupts spatial continuity. In thick-cloud regions, surface structures and spectral information are often extensively missing. CNN-based cloud removal methods can recover local textures, but they are less effective at modeling global structures and color consistency over large cloud-covered areas. Transformer-based methods capture long-range dependencies; however, standard self-attention introduces high computational and memory costs for high-resolution remote sensing images. Efficient attention reduces this cost but may weaken edge and texture discriminability. SAR imagery can penetrate clouds and provide surface structural information, yet repeated SAR injections may propagate speckle noise, cross-modal misalignment, and imaging discrepancies through deep restoration layers. To address these issues, this paper proposes DST-SARNet, a dual-stage SAR structural guidance network for optical remote sensing image cloud removal. In this framework, dual-stage refers to two explicit SAR-guidance positions: early structural skeleton guidance at the input side and late high-frequency modulation near the output. The Texture-Aware Asymmetric Retrieval module is placed between these two stages as a bottleneck memory retrieval operation rather than as a third dense SAR injection stage. With this design, SAR provides structural skeletons, readable texture memory, and terminal detail compensation, while the optical branch remains responsible for color, semantics, and spectral appearance recovery. Experiments on the SMILE-CR and SEN12MS-CR datasets show that DST-SARNet effectively restores cloud-contaminated imagery with a compact model scale, demonstrating its potential for efficient SAR-assisted optical cloud removal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: