Article examines ethical guidelines for psychologists assessing research participants, proposing reforms for better alignment with standards.
This article delineates the distinctive character of the psychology profession in Poland and references the legal frameworks that regulate its practice. It further describes imminent legislative reforms aimed at rectifying systemic deficiencies that undermine the integrity of psychological services. Additionally, the article proposes code-based measures to better align legislative efforts with established ethical standards. This article examines the ethical issues faced by individuals assessed by psychologists, as outlined in statutes and codes of ethics. It uses phenomenological analysis to seek the reasons behind existing and proposed guidelines. The analysis is based on the “ethics of social consequences”, a framework that is neither utilitarian nor consequentialist. This framework includes material tenets (such as values and principles) and formal tenets (such as types of behavior). By following this approach, psychologists can both maintain professional autonomy and receive clear guidance for dealing with moral dilemmas. The aim is to help them achieve the best possible outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paulina Dubiel-Zielińska (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: