Demonstrates effective red tilapia weight classification using UAV imagery, indicating the significance of image size on accuracy.
This study proposed an artificial intelligence framework for red tilapia weight-range classification from UAV-based aerial imagery using two hybrid deep learning models, namely Hybrid CNN-XGBoost and Hybrid EfficientNet-B0-XGBoost. Two image sizes were evaluated: 5 × 5 m images, which preserved the spatial context of the cage culture system, and 2 × 2 m images, which focused on areas with high fish aggregation density. For the 5 × 5 m images, Hybrid CNN-XGBoost achieved the highest performance, with a mean accuracy of 0.988 ± 0.008 (98.8%) at 20 tuning units, whereas Hybrid EfficientNet-B0-XGBoost achieved 0.977 ± 0.021 (97.7%) at 40 tuning units. In addition, Hybrid CNN-XGBoost exhibited a substantially shorter average computational workflow time per image (0.038 ± 0.001 s) than Hybrid EfficientNet-B0-XGBoost (65.007 ± 6.141 s). In contrast, under the 2 × 2 m image condition with limited spatial context, Hybrid EfficientNet-B0-XGBoost outperformed Hybrid CNN-XGBoost, achieving the highest mean accuracy of 0.900 ± 0.010 (90.0%) at 30 tuning units, compared with 0.850 ± 0.022 (85.0%) at 50 tuning units. These findings indicate that larger images improve classification accuracy by preserving spatial context, whereas EfficientNet-B0 enhances deep feature extraction capability and improves classification accuracy when spatial context is limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suwannasing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: